Legal Opinion

Robert F. Ford, Jr. v. Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of Exxonmobil Corporation

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2007No. 06-0293PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit involves one pipeline, two litigants, three tracts, and four deeds. In the fourth and final deed, Robert Ford granted a pipeline easement across three tracts of land, but now claims he did so based on misrepresentations about the three previous deeds. The court of appeals unanimously held his fraud claim barred by limitations, but in a divided opinion ordered the easement cancelled and the pipeline removed anyway because no statute of limitations applied to an equitable action to quiet title. 187 S.W.3d 154, 159-60 (TexApp.-Beaumont 2006). As we agree with the dissenting justice…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Barbara D. Cosgrove, Individually and as the Trustee of the Charles and Barbara Cosgrove Family Revocable Living Trust v. Michael Cade and Billie CadeTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Poag v. FloriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API