Legal Opinion

M.O. Dental Lab v. Rape

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2004No. 03-0146PublishedCited by 416 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this premises liability case is whether ordinary mud or dirt that accumulated naturally on a concrete slab outside a business posed an unreasonable risk of harm. Because we hold that, as a matter of law, it did not, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment in part and remand this case to the trial court.

Brenda Gail Rape filed a premises liability action against M.O. Dental Lab, Charlie Smith, Gerald W. Carter, Michael K. Zuber, and Lora Zuber after she slipped and fell on the pavement outside the M.O. Dental Lab. Rape alleged that she parked her car along the side of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. CMH Homes, Inc. v. DaenenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by416 opinions

  1. Western Investments, Inc. v. UrenaTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Paul Reed HarperTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Texas Integrated Conveyor Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Conveyor Concepts, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Oaic Commercial Assets, L.L.C. v. Stonegate Village, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Robert F. Ford, Jr. v. Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of Exxonmobil CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2007

411 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API