Legal Opinion

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2001No. 99-0406PublishedCited by 4,275 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice OWEN, Justice ABBOTT, and Justice O’NEILL joined.

In these two consolidated cases we revisit the persistent problem of determining when a judgment rendered without a conventional trial on the merits is final for purposes of appeal. We consider only cases in which one final and appealable judgment can be rendered and not cases, like some probate and receivership proceedings, in which multiple judgments final for purposes of appeal can be rendered on certain discrete issues.1 And we consider a judgment’s finality only for purposes of appeal and not for…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,275 opinions

  1. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Norris v. Hearst TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. De Ayala v. MacKieTexas Supreme Court · 2006

4,270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API