Legal Opinion

Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2006No. 05-0785PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Per curiam

Nine months after being assured it had been added as an additional insured to a vendor’s insurance policy, Safety Lights was denied coverage. After an unsuccessful suit on the policy, Safety Lights sued its vendor for breaching the promise to provide additional-insured coverage. 1 That suit was filed less than four years after coverage was denied, but more than four years after the promise to provide coverage was breached. The trial court held the claim was barred, but the court of appeals reversed as the discovery rule might make it timely. Because the discovery rule does not apply to this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. TIG Insurance v. Sedgwick James of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by263 opinions

  1. El Paso Field Services, L.P. and Gulfterra South Texas, L.P. F/K/A El Paso South Texas, L.P. v. Mastec North America, Inc. and Mastec, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Beavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API