Legal Opinion

In Re Jorden

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 06-0369PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

A Texas statute limits discovery in health-care lawsuits until the plaintiff serves an expert report summarizing how each defendant violated standards of care and caused the plaintiff injury. The issue here is whether that statute applies to presuit depositions authorized by Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the statute prohibits “all discovery” other than three exceptions — and Rule 202 depositions are not listed among them — we hold the statute prohibits such depositions until after an expert report is served.

I. Background & Jurisdiction

According to the petition filed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Certified Ems, Inc. D/B/A Cpns Staffing v. Cherie PottsTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Michael Pasko and Peggy PaskoTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bogar v. Esparza, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API