Legal Opinion

William Corbin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1960No. 13932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action by the United States of America brought under Title 7 U.S. C.A. § 1340, as amended, to recover 1383.04, as penalty because of appellant’s marketing excess of wheat for the 1954 crop years.

A motion for summary judgment on behalf of the Government was granted in the court below. The appeal to this court was based upon the theory that substantial questions of fact remained which would entitle the appellant-defendant to a jury trial.

At the time of the oral argument counsel for the appellant conceded that the administrative remedies provided for by statute and regulation had not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. National Lawyers Guild v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Walter J. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. John Donaldson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Pan American Mail Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  4. Mervin Gajewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API