Legal Opinion
James Weir v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1962No. 17058_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the United 'States against appellant James Weir to recover the penalty imposed by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as •amended, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 1281-1407. The United States sought to recover $16,776.-■80 farm marketing excess penalty, plus interest thereon, imposed by 7 U.S.C.A. § 1356, for appellant’s having raised more rice in the year 1959 than the farm marketing quota assigned to him allowed.
The appellant moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim, which •motion was denied. He then answered ■and asserted a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Vasys v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Walton v. Nalco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Winter v. Honeggers'& Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Stephen Johns v. S. Redeker, Charles Twist v. S. RedekerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.