United States v. Pan American Mail Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, District Judge.
OPINION
The United States claims that Pan American Mail Line has violated Section 18 of the Shipping Act, as amended, 46 U.S.C. § 817(b)(3) 1 by collecting an amount different from that stated in its tariff on file with the Federal Maritime Commission (hereinafter “the Commission”). The government seeks imposition of a civil penalty pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 817(b)(6) 2 and it has moved for summary judgment. The parties have submitted affidavits and briefs, including supplemental briefs at the Court’s request.
Rule 56 of the F.R.Civ.P. provides that summary judgment may be…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zima Corp. v. M. v. ROMAN PAZINSKIDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Lipton v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Denby v. Seaboard World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc. v. 245 Packages of Guatambu SquaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S American ArgosyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.