Legal Opinion

Walter J. Miller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1957No. 12860_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

This action was instituted for the purpose of collecting penalties under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1281 et seq., 7 U.S.C. A. § 1281 et seq. On motion of the Government the District Court granted summary judgment against defendant 1 in the amount of $302.40 with costs.

Two principal questions are presented: (1) whether the action for penalties is quasi-criminal and hence the summary judgment procedure available under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. is not available here; (2) whether defendant’s failure to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Henry KissingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Rigby v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. John R. Donaldson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API