Legal Opinion

John Donaldson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1958No. 13413PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was the owner and operator of a farm in Huron County, Ohio. Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, Section 1281 et seq., Title 7 U.S.C.A. he was given a wheat acre allotment of 11 acres for the farm for the 1956 crop of wheat. He sowed 19 acres, producing a normal yield of 24 bushels per acre, with a resulting farm marketing excess of wheat of 192 bushels. The rate of penalty applicable to the 1956 crop of wheat was $1.07 per bushel, resulting in a total penalty of $205.44. Appellant did not apply under the Act and regulations for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. John R. Donaldson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Corpstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Dighton v. CoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. William Corbin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API