Legal Opinion

Mervin Gajewski v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1964No. 17386_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by defendant Mervin Gajewski 1 from final judgment against him on a seven-count complaint seeking farm marketing excess penalties with respect to wheat under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended. 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq. 2 Jurisdiction for the enforcement of the penalty is conferred upon the trial court by 7 U.S.C.A. § 1376 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345.

The first six counts relate to a farm known as No. 33-20. Penalties are sought for the years 1954 through 1959. Defendant during each of such years owned and operated…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. Ethan Stangland, United States of America v. Max MunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacqueline W. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. GajewskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Norman KopfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. ApplingDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1965
  5. Lindsey Bros. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API