Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Holland v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 30, 2003No. 95-524CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Homer J. Holland (Holland) and Howard R. Ross (Ross), filed a complaint in this Winstar-related case for the recovery of damages arising out of the defendant’s alleged breach of contracts, Fifth Amendment taking of plaintiffs’ contract rights, and various other theories of recovery, as a result of the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989). Specifically, the plaintiffs’ complaint identifies ten causes of action against the defendant based on contractual and…

2Cases cited122 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Sacco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API