Sacco v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Geraldine Sacco and Karen Vesterby, seek attorney’s fees they incurred while litigating adverse personnel determinations before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Plaintiffs previously sought these fees before the MSPB under the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), but the MSPB denied their requests because the Plaintiffs did not qualify as prevailing parties, and in Plaintiff Sacco’s case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the MSPB’s ruling. Plaintiffs then changed their tack and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sacco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Gallo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Robert A. Athey v. the United States 9United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.