Legal Opinion

Lane v. Messer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1986No. 19190, 19206PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice.

Plaintiff Frank F. Lane, having complied with Rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, appeals from a summary judgment of the district court which dismissed his complaint for personal injuries as against defendant Honeywell, Inc. The issue presented is whether the evidence before the district court raised a genuine issue as to any material fact which would preclude the entry of summary judgment. Utah R.Civ.P. 56(c).

On July 24, 1981, a little after midnight, Lane was driving a tractor-trailer rig south on Interstate Highway 15 in Salt Lake County when his brake system…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sullivan v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Foster v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Thompson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mascaro v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API