Legal Opinion

Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1991No. 890416PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Appellants Kennecott Corp., Morton Thiokol, Inc., Barrick Resources (USA) Inc., and Hercules, Inc. (collectively “the taxpayers”), brought an action against the *1100Utah State Tax Commission and several county and state tax officials (collectively “the tax collectors”). The taxpayers contend that section 17-19-15 of the Code, which imposes a levy to provide funds to cover expenses incurred by Utah’s counties in assessing, collecting, and distributing property taxes, is unconstitutional.1 The taxpayers advance claims of invalidity under three separate constitutional provisions:…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Building, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ledfors v. Emery County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API