Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1932No. 5119PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, J. ,
Plaintiff by this review seeks to reverse an order of the Industrial Commission of Uath denying compensation for injuries suffered by him at Poughkeepsie, N. Y. The Industrial Commission concluded, after a hearing and the making of findings, that the accident from which the injuries to plaintiff resulted did not arise out of or occur to plaintiff while he was engaged in the course of his employment. The only question for review is whether this conclu sion was justified by the law and the evidence. The findings of the commission state the facts fairly and adequately as follows:
“Tha…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Cook's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Southern Casualty Co. v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Frigidaire Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Lane v. MesserUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Morgan v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Stroud v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.