Legal Opinion

Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1995No. 940054PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Margaret B. Hall petitions for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of a court of appeals decision that affirmed the trial court’s ruling of no cause of action on her breach of contract claim. Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc., 866 P.2d 604 (Utah Ct.App.1993). The court of appeals concluded that the trial court correctly applied the parol evidence rule to exclude testimony regarding the parties’ employment agreement. We affirm.

In February 1981, plaintiff entered into a written employment agreement with defendant Process Instruments and Control, Inc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WetzelUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nay v. General Motors Corp., GMC Truck DivisionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. a House & 1.37 Acres of Real Property Located at 392 South 600 EastUtah Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Tangren Family Trust v. Tangren Ex Rel. TangrenUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingUtah Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API