Legal Opinion

Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2002No. 20000385PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

T1 This appeal arises from a breach of contract action. Appellant Janet Peterson (Peterson) claims the right to receive commissions from appellee, Sunrider Corporation (Sunrider), for sales made by a particular group of Sunrider distributors, pursuant to a contract executed . in . 1976. - Commissions were paid from 1976 to 1994, but in 1994 Sunrider ceased making regular payments under the agreement and Peterson sued. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court denied Peterson's motion for sum mary judgment and dismissed the claim, finding as a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. PritchettUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API