Legal Opinion

Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1980No. 16345PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Donald 0. Martinson seeks review of an order of defendant Industrial Commission denying him workmen’s compensation for injuries suffered in an auto accident November 21, 1976, which he claims occurred in the course of his employment with defendant W-M Insurance Agency.

The controversy here is over whether Mr. Martinson was in the performance of his duties for the insurance agency when he became involved in an automobile collision on his return from what he claims was a combined business-pleasure trip to Park City on November 20, 1976.

The projected factual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Evans v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Thompson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Whitehead v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Buczynski v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. Lane v. MesserUtah Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API