Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1933No. 5475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

Plaintiff, a deputy fish and game warden in the employ of the state, on March 6, 1933, sustained an injury by accident while attempting to start his automobile, resulting in total loss of sight in his left eye. He made application to the Industrial Commission of Utah for compensation alleging that the accident occurred in the course of his employment. Compensation was denied, and the cause was brought to this court for review. The only question presented is whether the accident occurred in the course of employment.

The facts, which are not in dispute, are, with certain exceptions hereinafter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Derleth v. Roach & Seeber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kahn Bros. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Beaver City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sullivan v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. KeenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lane v. MesserUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lane v. MesserUtah Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API