Legal Opinion
Intercontinental Marble Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 25, 2004No. 03-1555PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The United States (the “government”) appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting summary judgment in favor of Intercontinental Marble (“ICM”), thereby reversing the classification by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of certain merchandise imported by ICM. Intercont’l Marble Corp. v. United States, 264 F.Supp.2d 1306 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2003). Because we agree that Customs has not identified any support for its changed interpretation of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aromant Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- LeMANS CORP. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Jedwards International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.