Legal Opinion
Faus Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 15, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-143; Court 03-00313PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Faus Group, Inc. (“Faus”), challenges the denial of its protest of the liquidation of its laminated flooring panels (“merchandise” or “flooring panels”). The United States Customs Service (“Customs” or “Government”) 1 classified the merchandise under heading 4411 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the of the United States (“HTSUS”) (2001) which covers “[f]iberboard of wood or other ligneous materials, whether or not bonded with resins or other organic substances.” Faus avers that its merchandise should be classified under heading 4418, HTSUS, as “guilders’…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Trumpf Medical Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.