United States v. Mead Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
The question is whether a tariff classification ruling by the United States Customs Service deserves judicial deference. The Federal Circuit rejected Customs’s invocation of Chevron U S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 (1984), in support of such a ruling, to which it gave no deference. We agree that a tariff classification has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron, there being no indication that Congress intended such a ruling to carry the force of law, but we hold that under Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U. S. 134 (1944), the ruling is eligible to…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,019 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
3,014 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.