Legal Opinion
Mita Copystar America v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 11, 1994No. 93-1466PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Mita Copystar America (Mita) appeals .the May 20, 1993 decision of the United States Court of International Trade, No. 90-05-00260, slip op. 93-76,1993 WL 179285, granting the government’s motion for summary judgment and denying Mita’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The court held that the United States Customs Service (Customs) properly classified Mita’s toners and developers as “Chemical preparations” under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), subheading 3707.90.30. Because no legal error has been shown, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Mita imports…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Totes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.