Legal Opinion

LeMANS CORP. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 8, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-14; Court 06-00038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge:

This case concerns the U.S. Customs & Border Protection’s (“Customs”) classification of certain motocross jerseys, motocross pants, and motorcycle jackets under Chapters 61 and 62 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Defendant United States moves the court for summary judgment, arguing that Customs classified the subject merchandise under the appropriate provisions of the HTSUS. Plaintiff LeMans Corporation (“LeMans” or “Plaintiff’) contests the classification and cross-moves the court for summary judgment, alleging that subheadings within…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Riddell, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  4. Graphite Sales v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API