Legal Opinion
Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 10, 1999No. 98-1546PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Carl Zeiss, Inc. appeals from the June 23, 1998 decision of the United States Court of International Trade denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the United States’ cross-motion for summary judgment that the United States Customs Service correctly classified its imported ZMS 319 product under subheadings 9011.10.40 and 9011.90.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, 19 U.S.C. § 1202 (1994) (HTSUS). See Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United States, 16 F.Supp.2d 1097 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1998). Because we conclude that Customs correctly classified the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- North American Processing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.