Legal Opinion

Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 8, 2013No. 2012-1411PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (“Deck-ers”) appeals a final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) that held that pull-on boots were properly classified under subheading 6404.19.35 (“Subheading 19.35”) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). See Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United States, 844 F.Supp.2d 1324 (Ct.Int’l Trade 2012) (“Trade Court Decision”). Because we conclude that the merchandise at issue was correctly classified as “footwear of the slip-on type” under Subheading 19.35, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Deckers…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. R.T. Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Dependable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Shamrock Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  4. Kalle USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  5. Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API