C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
C.A., a minor, sued his public high school guidance counselor and the school district for damages arising out of sexual harassment and abuse by the counselor. The trial court sustained the school district’s demurrer, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. On review, the question presented is whether the district may be found vicariously liable for the acts of its employees (Gov. Code, § 815.2) 1 —not for the acts of the counselor, which were outside the scope of her employment (see John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 438, 441, 451-452 [256 Cal.Rptr. 766, 769…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Estate of Osuna v. Cnty. of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Estate of Mendez v. City of CeresDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.