Legal Opinion

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2018No. S236765PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Here we consider a question of California insurance law posed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: When a third party sues an employer for the negligent hiring, retention, and supervision of an employee who intentionally injured that third party, does the suit allege an "occurrence" under the employer's commercial general liability policy? ( Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Constr. Co. (9th Cir. 2016) 834 F.3d 998 , 1000.) 1 The answer turns on whether the injury can be considered "accidental." We conclude that it can.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellants Ledesma &…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. J.W. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Harper Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
  3. AIU Insurance Company, et al. v. McKesson CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Anna Voyne v. Longs Drug Stores California L.L.C., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Brent Nussbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API