Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*670Opinion
PANELLI, J.
We granted review in this case to determine whether the scope of the duty owed by the owner of a shopping center to maintain common areas within its possession and control in a reasonably safe condition includes providing security guards in those areas. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, the owner did not owe a duty to provide security guards.
I. Background
This case arises out of a civil complaint filed by Ann M. after she was raped at her place of employment. Unless otherwise indicated, the facts as stated herein are not in dispute.1
On June 17, 1985, Ann M. was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by327 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.