Legal Opinion

Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1993No. S030815PublishedCited by 327 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*670Opinion

PANELLI, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether the scope of the duty owed by the owner of a shopping center to maintain common areas within its possession and control in a reasonably safe condition includes providing security guards in those areas. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, the owner did not owe a duty to provide security guards.

I. Background

This case arises out of a civil complaint filed by Ann M. after she was raped at her place of employment. Unless otherwise indicated, the facts as stated herein are not in dispute.1

On June 17, 1985, Ann M. was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by327 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010

322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API