Legal Opinion
San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2013No. A134543PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*424Opinion
DONDERO, J.
This appeal has been taken from the trial court’s ruling that sustained defendants’ demurrer to all the causes of action of plaintiffs’ complaint and dismissed the action. We find that plaintiffs cannot properly state a cause of action for breach of contract, and defendants have public entity immunity from the remaining noncontractual causes of action. We therefore affirm the judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs in the present action are school districts that invested money in the San Mateo Pooled Investment Fund (the Pool), managed and operated by…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- AE Ex Rel. Hernandez v. County of TulareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Nozzi v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Freeny v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.