Legal Opinion

Weeks v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1998No. C7-96-2438PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This case requires us to address whether a cause of action for uninsured motorist (UM) benefits accrues on the date of the accident or on the date the insurer rejects the claim. Respondent Shari Weeks was injured in a ear accident on July 4, 1987, while she was a passenger in a friend’s car. The friend’s car was hit from behind by two other cars, but the drivers of the other cars fled the scene and were never identified. Weeks made a demand for UM coverage in June 1992, which appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company rejected. On May 22, 1995, Weeks commenced…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. v. BarcomWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lane v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Herrmann v. McMenomy & SeversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Antone v. MirvissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API