Legal Opinion

Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 2000No. 93457PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 KAUGER, J.:

12 We are asked to answer the question of when the statute of limitations begins to run on an action for the recovery of benefits under an uninsured/underinsured motorist policy. The insured argues that the limitation period is not triggered until the breach of the contract occurs. The insurer asserts that the cause of action accrues on the date of the accident giving rise to the claim. We are persuaded by our earlier decision in Uptegraft v. Home Ins. Co., 1983 OK 41, 662 P.2d 681 in which we held that actions on a claim for recovery of uninsured motorist benefits are governed…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Buzzard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. MORGAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API