Legal Opinion

Lolling v. Midwest Patrol

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1996No. C4-95-300PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

The Commissioner of Economic Security (commissioner) appeals from a decision of the court of appeals holding that under Minn. Stat. § 268.10, subd. 1(d) (1992), which requires an employer to raise a known issue of disqualification within seven days of the mailing of the notice of the employee’s claim for benefits, the Department of Economic Security (department) lacks jurisdiction to consider an employer’s late protest that a former employee is disqualified from receiving reemployment insurance benefits. Taking into consideration all the provisions of Minn.Stat. §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re Senty-HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Matter of Welfare of JMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Wong v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API