Legal Opinion
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1999No. C2-98-388PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
On October 31, 1996, respondents A1 Herr-mann (Herrmann), the sole owner and only employee of A1 Herrmann Construction, Inc. (AHC), and AHC commenced a legal malpractice action against appellants McMeno-my & Severson, P.A. and two of its attorneys, Michael G. Dougherty and Larry S. Severson (hereinafter collectively referred to as “McMenomy & Severson”). 1 The complaint alleged that McMenomy & Severson was negligent in failing to advise Herrmann and AHC that certain business transactions AHC entered into with the A1 Herrmann Employees Defined Benefit Pension Plan and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Weston v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- TCF National Bank v. Market Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC v. Telesys Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.