Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance Co. v. Barcom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1989No. 54946-0, 54997-4PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

These two cases, consolidated by order of this court for purposes of this opinion, both present the issue of whether the 6-year, contract statute of limitation, or the 3-year, tort statute of limitation applies to an insured's action against his or her insurer for benefits under the uninsured motorist (UIM) provisions of an automobile insurance policy.

Facts Pertaining to Safeco v. Barcom

On April 27, 1979, while riding as a passenger in his son's automobile, Gaylon Barcom was injured by an unidentified vehicle. At the time of the accident, Barcom and his son were each insured under their own…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Franco v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between De Luca & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API