Legal Opinion

California ex rel. Department of Public Works v. 25.09 Acres of Lands

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 26, 1971No. Civ. No. 68-118-JPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMESON, Senior District Judge.

The State of California has condemned lands for highway purposes, including 25.09 acres on the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, located in Imperial County, California. The land was allotted in severalty to six named defendants and is held in trust by the defendant United States. The land is subject to assessment for water services from facilities of the Yuma Project, a federal reclamation project. The United States claims a compensable interest by reason of its right to assess an annual operation and maintenance charge against all…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Chapman v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. 129.4 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Yuma, State of Arizona, and Fred W. Kamrath, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. 129.4 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1976
  3. City of Chicago v. PrologisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. City of Chicago v. PrologisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API