City & County of San Francisco v. McGovern
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Rowan Hardin, District Attorney of Tuolumne County, J. C. Campbell, Frank C. Scherrer, Walter Shelton, and Thomas Breeze, for Appellants. Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, J. F. English, and Robert M. Searls, Assistant City Attorneys, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action arises on a petition for a writ of mandate by the city and county of San Francisco against the board of supervisors and the district attorney of Tuolumne County, asking for a writ of mandate compelling such board of supervisors to have entered upon the minutes of said board an order directing the auditor of the county of Tuolumne to cancel certain assessments for taxes for the fiscal years 1911 and ’12, and 1912 and ’13; and likewise directing such board of supervisors to direct the auditor of said county of Tuolumne to cancel any other assessments which may have been levied by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Ross v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HornbeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.