Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, J., pro tem.
The defendants appeal from a judgment of the trial court annulling the approval of the Board of Supervisors of Colusa County of a reapportionment by the trustees of Reclamation District No. 108 of a delinquent assessment on a particularly described parcel of land within such district. The main question presented on this appeal can be stated as follows: After a tract of reclamation district land has passed by purchase at a delinquent assessment sale into the ownership of the county treasurer, as trustee for the district, may the tract be subdivided and the assessment on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Reclamation District No. 684 v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Morris v. PoundstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by32 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.