Legal Opinion

Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1941No. Sac. No. 5345PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, J., pro tem.

The defendants appeal from a judgment of the trial court annulling the approval of the Board of Supervisors of Colusa County of a reapportionment by the trustees of Reclamation District No. 108 of a delinquent assessment on a particularly described parcel of land within such district. The main question presented on this appeal can be stated as follows: After a tract of reclamation district land has passed by purchase at a delinquent assessment sale into the ownership of the county treasurer, as trustee for the district, may the tract be subdivided and the assessment on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Reclamation District No. 684 v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Morris v. PoundstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API