Legal Opinion

Massee v. Consumers Hay Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 1931No. 28,524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion “for an order setting aside and vacating the summons herein and the service thereof.”

Defendant is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of business at Rhinelander in that state. It is engaged in the business of buying and selling hay for commercial purposes.

The action is based upon two checks payable to plaintiff and issued and delivered by defendant to plaintiff for the purchase price of two carloads of baled hay. Payment on these checks was stopped by defendant, and they were duly protested.

Defendant never complied with G. S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hagerty v. National Fur & Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Massey Steamship Co. v. Norske Lloyd InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Barrette v. Melin Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Pierce v. Grand Army of the RepublicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Bliss v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API