Legal Opinion

Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. 27,272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff had a verdict for $25,000 but consented to a reduction thereof by the trial court to $23,500. Defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial, and the order was affirmed here. 175 Minn. 150, 220 N. W. 412. After the case whs remanded to the district court, defendants again moved for a new trial but upon the sole ground of newly discovered evidence, the latter consisting of proof of happenings subsequent to the trial. That motion was denied, and defendants again appeal.

Defendants have had plaintiff under surveillance by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, by G. A. Youngquist v. WatrousSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Barrette v. Melin Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Massee v. Consumers Hay Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API