Legal Opinion

Barrette v. Melin Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1920No. 21,795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to sequestrate the property of defendant corporation and for the appointment of a receiver. Subsequently George S. Grimes was appointed receiver, and obtained an order of court directing him as receiver to convey certain real property by quitclaim deed to Landers-Morrison-Christenson Company.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to sequestrate the property of defendant corporation and for the appointment of a receiver. Subsequently George S. Grimes was appointed receiver, and obtained an order of court directing him as receiver to convey certain real property by quitclaim deed to Landers-Morrison-Christenson Company. From an order, Jelley, J., denying its motion to set aside the order mentioned above, ’and the deed made pursuant to that order, Melin Brothers, Incorporated, appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

A judgment having been rendered against Melin Brothers, Incorporated, and an execution issued thereon having been returned unsatisfied, George S. Grimes was appointed receiver of the corporation on April 13, 1917, in proceedings to sequester its assets for the benefit of its creditors. On September 6, 1919, the court authorized and directed the receiver to execute to Landers-Morrison-Christenson Company a quitclaim deed to part of a lot in the city of Minneapolis, of which they Were in possession, on payment to him of the sum of $100. The receiver received the payment and executed…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massee v. Consumers Hay Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API