Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Collette

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1938No. Nos. 31,564, 31,565PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 279 N.W. 561. Appeals from orders denying motions of defendant Gardner-Richardson Company, the sole appellant, to set aside the attempted service upon it of the summonses and complaints in these actions.

Appellant is an Ohio corporation whose principal place of business is in Middletown in that state, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of butter cartons. It is not authorized to do business in this state and has no office here, but is represented by defendant Henry T. Collette, a traveling salesman, who covers a territory embracing this and several other northwestern…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Schilling v. Roux Distributing Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API