Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Grand Army of the Republic

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1945No. 34,069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, -Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside service of summons and complaint.

Defendant, an organization of Union Civil War veterans, dating from shortly after the Civil War, was in 1924 by a special act of congress “created a body corporate and politic of the District of Columbia.” The act designated its principal office to be the city of Washington and vested the corporation’s controlling authority in the National Encampment, consisting of representatives from the several departments then or thereafter organized. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that, contrary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. W. J. Armstrong Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. High v. Supreme Lodge of the WorldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Kummer Ex Rel. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Nerlund v. SchiavoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Jacobs v. Ass'n of Independent Colleges & SchoolsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API