Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Collette

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1938No. Nos. 31,564, 31,565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Appeals from orders denying motions of defendant Gardner-Richardson Company, the sole appellant, to set aside the attempted service upon it of the summonses and complaints in these actions.

Appellant is an Ohio corporation whose principal place of business is in Middletown in that state, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of butter cartons. It is not authorized to do business in this state and has no office here, but is represented by defendant Henry T. Collette, a traveling salesman, who covers a territory embracing this and several other northwestern states.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Pierce v. Grand Army of the RepublicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Continental Convention & Show Management, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API