Stafford v. California Canning Peach Growers
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The two respondents R. M. and H. L. Stafford are sons of T. H. Stafford. ° During the times here-involved the father owned a ranch in Sutter County, about 100 acres of which were devoted to the growing of canning peaches. In 1932 and prior thereto, this ranch was operated by the father and these two sons under an oral agreement to split the profits and losses. Under this agreement the ultimate control of all questions of policy involving the ranch, rested in the father, who was approaching 80 years of age. In 1932 the father became a regular member of appellant association and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horton v. WinbiglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Murray v. DakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Nat'l Bank of Cal. v. Exch. Nat'l Bank of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Groover v. BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Estate of StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Estate of StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950