Murray v. Dake
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Belcher, J.:
This action is ejectment to recover the second story of a brick building and the yard in the rear of an adjoining building. The plaintiff claims under a lease made by the defendant to himself and one William Murray of “all that certain brick -building situate at the southwest corner of California and Main streets, in the City of Stockton, together with the lot on which the same stands, and the rear yard to the depth of seventy feet.”
When the lease was executed the plaintiff and William Murray were in possession of the building, which had then but one story, using it…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hall v. First National Bank of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Eva v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hare & Chase, Inc. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Isenhoot v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.