Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The appeal in this ease was taken to the district court of appeal, which rendered a judgment of reversal. A rehearing was ordered, and, upon the second submission, two of the justices adhered to the views first announced, while the third wrote an opinion for affirmance. Upon this failure to agree the appeal was transferred to this court for hearing and determination.
Our own examination of the case has satisfied us of the correctness of the disposition first made by the court of appeal, and we adopt the following opinion of Hall, J., giving the reasons upon which that court based its…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Barlow v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Laurent v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.