Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1928No. Docket No. 6177PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This is an action brought to reform a contract of purchase and sale of certain letters patent. Injunctive relief also is asked. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs, and from such judgment and from the order denying a new trial and a motion to retax costs the defendants Robert H. Anderson, Ruth B. Anderson, Ruth B. Anderson as assignee of Robert H. Anderson, Ruth B. Anderson as assignee of W. C. James and Robert H. Anderson have appealed.
The contract in question was entered into on April 15, 1921, between Ruth B. Anderson, Ruth B. Anderson as assignee of Robert H.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Millard v. Supreme Council of American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Coast Electric Service, Inc. v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Douglass v. DahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.