Legal Opinion

California Canning Peach Growers v. Harkey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1938No. Sac. 5102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was commenced by plaintiff, California Canning Peach Growers, a non-profit cooperative association, against defendants for the purpose of having its rights declared under a written agreement alleged to have been entered into between the association and defendants. Defendants Harkey answered setting up their interpretation of the transaction, and cross-complained for certain sums alleged to be due from the association to them. The Harter Packing Company was originally made a defendant, but upon paying certain sums into court, by consent of all concerned, was dismissed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Main v. CasserlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Creighton v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cooperative Milk Service, Inc. v. HepnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Eddy v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API